Milton L. Stern v. Thomas L. Robinson and United States of America

Sixth Circuit

Milton L. Stern v. Thomas L. Robinson and United States of America

391 F.2d 601

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1968

Docket17768_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 601 (Milton L. Stern v. Thomas L. Robinson and United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milton L. Stern v. Thomas L. Robinson and United States of America, 391 F.2d 601 (6th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant brought this action against the defendant agent of the Internal Revenue Service and the United States seeking the return of evidence obtained from him by the agent and an injunction enjoining the presentation of such evidence to a grand jury for the purpose of securing a criminal indictment against him. Although a formal order dismissing the complaint was not entered until after the returning of an indictment against the plaintiff-appellant, the evidence was presented to the grand jury and the indictment returned the day following the filing of the District Judge’s memorandum decision, 262 F.Supp. 13, sustaining the appellees’ motion to dismiss. The appeal to this court is from that order of dismissal.

Appellees have here filed their motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground, among others, that the order of the District Court is not appealable, and under our previous direction that motion was heard at the hearing of the cause on its merits. It is here determined that the order from which this appeal was perfected was interlocutory and unappealable, and that this court is “without appellate jurisdiction to review the order of the District Court declining to enjoin presentation of evidence to a grand jury.” Austin v. United States of America, 353 F.2d 512 (4th Cir. 1962); see also Di Bella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 82 S.Ct. 654, 7 L.Ed.2d 614 (1962). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of the appellees to dismiss should be and is granted, and this cause is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

JOHN W. PECK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant brought this action against the defendant agent of the Internal Revenue Service and the United States seeking the return of evidence obtained from him by the agent and an injunction enjoining the presentation of such evidence to a grand jury for the purpose of securing a criminal indictment against him. Although a formal order dismissing the complaint was not entered until after the returning of an indictment against the plaintiff-appellant, the evidence was presented to the grand jury and the indictment returned the day following the filing of the District Judge’s memorandum decision, 262 F.Supp. 13, sustaining the appellees’ motion to dismiss. The appeal to this court is from that order of dismissal.

Appellees have here filed their motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground, among others, that the order of the District Court is not appealable, and under our previous direction that motion was heard at the hearing of the cause on its merits. It is here determined that the order from which this appeal was perfected was interlocutory and unappealable, and that this court is “without appellate jurisdiction to review the order of the District Court declining to enjoin presentation of evidence to a grand jury.” Austin v. United States of America, 353 F.2d 512 (4th Cir. 1962); see also Di Bella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 82 S.Ct. 654, 7 L.Ed.2d 614 (1962). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of the appellees to dismiss should be and is granted, and this cause is hereby dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 F.2d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-l-stern-v-thomas-l-robinson-and-united-states-of-america-ca6-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack