Milton E. Canter and Louis Urow v. James C. Toomey, Temporary Receiver of Blundon Investment Corporation
This text of 258 F.2d 430 (Milton E. Canter and Louis Urow v. James C. Toomey, Temporary Receiver of Blundon Investment Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
258 F.2d 430
Milton E. CANTER and Louis Urow, Appellants,
v.
James C. TOOMEY, Temporary Receiver of Defendant Blundon Investment Corporation, et al., Appellees.
No. 14346.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued June 2, 1958.
Decided June 12, 1958.
Petition for Rehearing Denied September 9, 1958.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Alexander Holtzoff, District Judge.
Mr. Louis Urow, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Milton E. Canter, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Walter E. Gillcrist, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. James C. Toomey, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.
Messrs. Albert Brick and Samuel Intrater, Washington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee Mary E. Seaman Harris.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal involves orders of the District Court fixing the compensation of a receiver appointed by it, and directing payment of the compensation fixed. We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 F.2d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-e-canter-and-louis-urow-v-james-c-toomey-temporary-receiver-of-cadc-1958.