Milton County Bank v. Bagwell

165 S.E. 151, 45 Ga. App. 450, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 359
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1932·No. 21909·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

1. Under the Civil Code (1910), § 5284, a garnishee, if accessible, must be given notice of a traverse to his answer. If no such notice is given a judgment against the garnishee is void (Civil Code of 1910, § 5286), and may be attacked by affidavit of illegality. Haney v. Owens, 39 Ga. App. 462 (147 S. E. 720). And see Payne v. Brown Construction Co., 44 Ga. App. 592 (3) (162 S. E. 410).

2. Mere presence of the garnishee in the courtroom at the time the issue made by the traverse to his answer of no indebtedness was tried and judgment rendered against him- would not dispense with the right to previous written notice of the traverse as required by the Civil Code, § 5284 (Vaughan v. Bank of Cobbtown, 14 Ga. App. 9, 79 S. E. 1130), or amount to an appearance and a waiver of such service. Civil Code (1910),.| 5559.

3. Since it appears, without dispute, that notice of the traverse to his answer was never served upon the garnishee in the instant case, and it does not appear that he was inaccessible, the verdict in favor of his affidavit of illegality was authorized.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Sutlon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milton County Bank v. Bagwell, 165 S.E. 151, 45 Ga. App. 450, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

165 S.E. 151 (Milton County Bank v. Bagwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaughan v. Bank of Cobbtown
79 S.E. 1130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Haney & Tinsley v. Owens
147 S.E. 720 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Payne v. Brown Construction Co.
162 S.E. 410 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)