Milton C. Inciarte v. United States Marshal's Service, Milton C. Inciarte v. United States Marshal's Service

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23413
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 1995
Docket95-6006
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 166 (Milton C. Inciarte v. United States Marshal's Service, Milton C. Inciarte v. United States Marshal's Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milton C. Inciarte v. United States Marshal's Service, Milton C. Inciarte v. United States Marshal's Service, 59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23413 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Milton C. INCIARTE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE, Defendant--Appellee.
Milton C. INCIARTE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE, Defendant--Appellee.

Nos. 95-6006, 95-6460.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995
Decided: June 20, 1995

Milton C. Inciarte, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, C.J., and BUTZNER, Sr. C.J.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief, initially and on reconsideration, on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court in its order denying relief following reconsideration. Inciarte v. United States Marshal's Serv., No. CA-94-1511-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-c-inciarte-v-united-states-marshals-service-ca4-1995.