Milton C. Inciarte v. James H. Dunning, Sheriff Ara Health Services, Incorporated John Doe John Doe, II

Fourth Circuit

Milton C. Inciarte v. James H. Dunning, Sheriff Ara Health Services, Incorporated John Doe John Doe, II

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24872, 1995 WL 419149

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 14, 1995

Docket95-6622

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 822 (Milton C. Inciarte v. James H. Dunning, Sheriff Ara Health Services, Incorporated John Doe John Doe, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milton C. Inciarte v. James H. Dunning, Sheriff Ara Health Services, Incorporated John Doe John Doe, II, 60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24872, 1995 WL 419149 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Milton C. INCIARTE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
James H. DUNNING, Sheriff; Ara Health Services,
Incorporated; John Doe; John Doe, II,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6622.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

Milton C. Inciarte, appellant pro se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, VA; Jeff Wayne Rosen, Adler, Rosen & Peters, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Inciarte v. Dunning, No. CA-92-1690-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Milton C. INCIARTE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
James H. DUNNING, Sheriff; Ara Health Services,
Incorporated; John Doe; John Doe, II,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6622.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

Milton C. Inciarte, appellant pro se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, VA; Jeff Wayne Rosen, Adler, Rosen & Peters, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Inciarte v. Dunning, No. CA-92-1690-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24872, 1995 WL 419149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milton-c-inciarte-v-james-h-dunning-sheriff-ara-he-ca4-1995.