Miltenberg v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 562
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 1957
DocketReap. Dec. 8722; Entry No. 19877
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 562 (Miltenberg v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miltenberg v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 562 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been sub-

mitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:
That the instant appeal for reappraisement covers flashlight bulbs from Hong Hong.
That on or about the date of exportation the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in Hong Kong, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, packing included, was the entered value less the ocean freight as invoiced.
That on or about the date of exportation the foreign value, as such value is defined in Sec. 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, was no higher.
That the instant appeal for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the entered value, less the ocean freight, as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Cust. Ct. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miltenberg-v-united-states-cusc-1957.