Milstein v. Milstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Milstein v. Milstein

302 A.D.2d 265, 753 N.Y.S.2d 835, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1523

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.D.2d 265 (Milstein v. Milstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milstein v. Milstein, 302 A.D.2d 265, 753 N.Y.S.2d 835, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered June 11, 2002, which granted defendants’ motion to renew their opposition to plaintiffs’ previously granted motion for appointment of a neutral referee to conduct a sealed bid auction of the parties’ Builtland Properties, but upon renewal [266]*266adhered to the court’s prior determination, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered February 13, 2002, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of a neutral referee to conduct a sealed bid auction of the parties’ Builtland Properties, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order entered June 11, 2002.

Our determination in Estate of Milstein v Milstein (298 AD2d 200), a matter involving the same parties and issues as the matter at bar, is dispositive of the instant appeal. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered June 11, 2002, which granted defendants’ motion to renew their opposition to plaintiffs’ previously granted motion for appointment of a neutral referee to conduct a sealed bid auction of the parties’ Builtland Properties, but upon renewal [266]*266adhered to the court’s prior determination, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered February 13, 2002, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of a neutral referee to conduct a sealed bid auction of the parties’ Builtland Properties, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order entered June 11, 2002.

Our determination in Estate of Milstein v Milstein (298 AD2d 200), a matter involving the same parties and issues as the matter at bar, is dispositive of the instant appeal. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 265, 753 N.Y.S.2d 835, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milstein-v-milstein-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack