Milstein v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Milstein v. Bell

197 A.D.2d 610, 604 N.Y.S.2d 758

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 610 (Milstein v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milstein v. Bell, 197 A.D.2d 610, 604 N.Y.S.2d 758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), dated August 28, 1991, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merits or to demonstrate that there was a reasonable excuse for the failure to serve the complaint timely (see, e.g., Kel Mgt. Corp. v Rogers & Wells, 64 NY2d 904; Ferrara v Guardino, 164 AD2d [611]*611932). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), dated August 28, 1991, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merits or to demonstrate that there was a reasonable excuse for the failure to serve the complaint timely (see, e.g., Kel Mgt. Corp. v Rogers & Wells, 64 NY2d 904; Ferrara v Guardino, 164 AD2d [611]*611932). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 610, 604 N.Y.S.2d 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milstein-v-bell-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack