Milsap v. State

32 A.D.2d 1017, 302 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Milsap v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 A.D.2d 586
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 1969·No. Claim No. 46884·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in a highway appropriation case, which was previously remitted by us for appropriate findings (see 32 A D 2d 586, in which the essential facts appear) in accordance with which a supplemental decision of the Court of Claims has been filed. The resulting award of $7,371 has adequate support in the record. While the after value of $53,499 is still substantially greater than any after value testified to, analysis of the decision in light of the factual findings now supplied adequately explains how the court arrived at this figure, the other components of the award being within the range of expert testimony. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum per Curiam; Aulisi, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milsap v. State, 32 A.D.2d 1017, 302 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 1017 (Milsap v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.