Milroy v. Eager

30 F. 544, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2482
CourtUnited States Circuit Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. 544 (Milroy v. Eager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milroy v. Eager, 30 F. 544, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2482 (uscirct 1887).

Opinion

Brewer, j.

This is a very simple case. Brown and Eager, officers of the West Point Butter & Cheese Association, without any formal authority from the directors, bought certain lands for the benefit of the association. The title was taken in the name of the defendant, William B. Eager. He executed the mortgages in question to B. D. Brown. Brown had been advancing large sums for the benefit of the association, and he took these mortgages, paying no consideration to Eager, for the purpose of using them as collateral to raise money for the benefit of the association. He did advance a large amount thereafter to the association, which has never been paid. He transferred the notes and mortgages for value, and they afterwards passed from his assignee to the present complainant. > Eager, subsequently to the mortgages, transferred the title to the association; and by consent of all parties, when the receiver took possession of the properties of the association, he took possession of' those lands. They have been sold, and the funds are in the hands of the court. The mortgages are all regular on their face, and the association was and is indebted to Brown largely in excess of tho amount of these mortgages, so there ivas ample consideration for them. I think, therefore, the mortgages should be foreclosed; and, as the property has in fact been sold, the order will be for the payment of the proceeds of the property, so far as is necessary, to the complainant on the notes secured by the mortgages.

The creditors of the association claim a right to be beard in this matter, and insist that the case should not be disposed of without further testimony on their behalf. The order for the payment of money will therefore be stayed, if within 60 days they give bond or security, to be [545]*545approved by the clerk of this court, conditioned to pay any extra interest which may hereafter accrue, and the costs of any subsequent testimony, if, after tbe taking of such testimony and the final hearing of the matter, it shall appear that their allegations are unfounded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. 544, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milroy-v-eager-uscirct-1887.