Milosy v. Greenhouse Flower Cooperative, Inc.
259 A.D. 812, 20 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6803
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied without prejudice to a renewal upon proof showing that plaintiff has a meritorious cause of action. (See Titus v. Halsted, 209 App. Div. 66.) Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Milosy v. Greenhouse Flower Cooperative, Inc., 259 A.D. 812, 20 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
259 A.D. 812 (Milosy v. Greenhouse Flower Cooperative, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Titus v. Halsted
209 A.D. 66 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)