Milos v. Exxon Co., USA
671 A.2d 120, 143 N.J. 333, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 37
This text of 671 A.2d 120 (Milos v. Exxon Co., USA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Milos v. Exxon Co., USA, 671 A.2d 120, 143 N.J. 333, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 37 (N.J. 1996).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J.Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300 (1995).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN — 6.
Opposed — none.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.
680 A.2d 750 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
671 A.2d 120, 143 N.J. 333, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milos-v-exxon-co-usa-nj-1996.