Milnes v. Principi
This text of 80 F. App'x 660 (Milnes v. Principi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kevin Milnes appeals the order of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We conclude that the Veterans Court properly-denied Milnes’ petition because he had not exhausted his administrative remedies as to the new claims he filed; the issue of the earlier remanded claims for service connection of back and lung conditions was moot; and he had not shown a clear and indisputable right to the writ. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court N. Dist. of Cal., 426 U.S. 394, 403, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). We therefore affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 F. App'x 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milnes-v-principi-cafc-2003.