Milner v. State
This text of 237 S.W. 1112 (Milner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appellant was indicted and convicted for the possession of intoxicating liquor under the state-wide prohibition law, prior to the acts of the Thirty-seventh Legislature, 1st and 2nd Called Sessions, page 233, amending the same. Under the authority of the cases Petit v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 336, 235 S. W. Rep. 579; Francis v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 67, 235 S. W. Rep. 580, and many other cases reported in the same volume of the S. W. Rep., and Ex parte Mitchum, 237 S. W. Rep., 936, No. 6772, (opinion delivered February 1st, 1922) the conviction can not stand under the indictment in its present form.
The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed under the present indictment.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 S.W. 1112, 91 Tex. Crim. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milner-v-state-texcrimapp-1922.