Milner v. Leland

4 P.2d 665, 51 Idaho 214, 1931 Ida. LEXIS 123
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 19, 1931
DocketNo. 5711.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 P.2d 665 (Milner v. Leland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milner v. Leland, 4 P.2d 665, 51 Idaho 214, 1931 Ida. LEXIS 123 (Idaho 1931).

Opinion

McNAUGHTON, J.

—This action involves the beneficial ownership and the rights and interests appertaining to certificate No. 5604 of the Twin Falls Canal Company. This certificate was involved in the case of Mendini v. Milner, 47 Ida. 439, 276 Pac. 313. Its ownership was the whole bone of contention in Leland v. Twin Falls Canal Co., ante, p. 204, 3 Pac. (2d) 1105, just decided by this court.

The holder of the lien for part of the purchase price of' this water stock permitted the right of action on the lien to expire by limitation, but sought to foreclose the lien and acquire title by pledge sale. It is claimed that the water right defined in the certificate is owned by the Canal Company and that the certificate represents only shares in that company; that as such, this stock is personalty and a proper subject of a pledge sale. The trial court held otherwise. Under the authority of Leland v. Twin Falls Canal Co., *215 just decided, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed with costs to the respondent.

Lee, C. J., Givens and Varían, JJ., and Koelsch, D. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.
12 P.2d 263 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 P.2d 665, 51 Idaho 214, 1931 Ida. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milner-v-leland-idaho-1931.