Milner v. Hatfield

8 Ky. Op. 536, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 216
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedNovember 13, 1875
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ky. Op. 536 (Milner v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milner v. Hatfield, 8 Ky. Op. 536, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 216 (Ky. Ct. App. 1875).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

There were two- plaintiffs to the action, and but one of them a non-resident, according to the facts stated in the affidavit filed. The language of the statute is when a non-resident or any corporation shall institute an action in any court, whether suing in his own right, or as the representative of another, he shall, before the com[537]*537mencement thereof, give bond, evidently meaning that when the non-resident is the only plaintiff in the action, he shall give bond with surety resident in this case, etc. But when there are two plaintiffs, and one of them is a resident of the state, neither the letter nor spirit of the statute requires a bond for cost to■ be executed. And perceiving no error in the judgment the same is affirmed.

J. C. Jonson, for appellants. Owen & Ellis, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ky. Op. 536, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milner-v-hatfield-kyctapp-1875.