Milner v. Hatfield
This text of 8 Ky. Op. 536 (Milner v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
There were two- plaintiffs to the action, and but one of them a non-resident, according to the facts stated in the affidavit filed. The language of the statute is when a non-resident or any corporation shall institute an action in any court, whether suing in his own right, or as the representative of another, he shall, before the com[537]*537mencement thereof, give bond, evidently meaning that when the non-resident is the only plaintiff in the action, he shall give bond with surety resident in this case, etc. But when there are two plaintiffs, and one of them is a resident of the state, neither the letter nor spirit of the statute requires a bond for cost to■ be executed. And perceiving no error in the judgment the same is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Ky. Op. 536, 1875 Ky. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milner-v-hatfield-kyctapp-1875.