Milner v. Combs

48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11039, 1995 WL 105290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1995
Docket94-7168
StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1216 (Milner v. Combs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milner v. Combs, 48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11039, 1995 WL 105290 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kenneth S. MILNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Sandra L. COMBS, joint and severally, individually and in
their official capacity as the Virginia State Parole Board;
Winnie R. Dixon, joint and severally, individually and in
her official capacity as the Virginia State Parole Board;
Joseph F. Lewis, joint and severally, individually and in
his official capacity as the Virginia State Parole Board;
J. B. Metzger, III, joint and severally, individually and in
his official capacity as the Virginia State Parole Board,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7168.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 14, 1995.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Milner v. Combs, No. CA-94-893 (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for counsel on appeal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11039, 1995 WL 105290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milner-v-combs-ca4-1995.