Milner v. Briggs

Illinois Supreme Court

Milner v. Briggs

45 Ill. 349

DecidedSeptember 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 45 Ill. 349 (Milner v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Milner v. Briggs, 45 Ill. 349 (Ill. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

It was decided in the case of Campbell v. Harris, 30 Ill. 395, that the action of debt on promissory notes made out of this State, and the cause of action on which accrued out of this State, before the passage of the limitation law of February 10, 1819, was not affected by any statute of limitation in force in this State. This case is precisely like that, and must be governed by the decision in that case.

The judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

It was decided in the case of Campbell v. Harris, 30 Ill. 395, that the action of debt on promissory notes made out of this State, and the cause of action on which accrued out of this State, before the passage of the limitation law of February 10, 1819, was not affected by any statute of limitation in force in this State. This case is precisely like that, and must be governed by the decision in that case.

The judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Ill. 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milner-v-briggs-ill-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack