Milmoe v. Murphy

56 A. 292, 65 N.J. Eq. 767, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 306
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided August 25, 1903·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevens, filed in the eonrt below. See 56 Atl. Rep. 292.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon.. Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom, Green — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milmoe v. Murphy, 56 A. 292, 65 N.J. Eq. 767, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 306 (N.J. 1903).

56 A. 292 (Milmoe v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moran v. Fifteenth Ward B. L. Assn.
25 A.2d 426 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Storch v. Tepperman
99 N.J. Eq. 48 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Binns v. Smith
115 A. 69 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1921)
Neptune Fisheries Co. v. Cape May Real Estate Co.
105 A. 212 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1918)
Martin v. Spaulding Et Ux.
1913 OK 711 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Weir Investment Co. v. Scattergood
42 Colo. 54 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)
Riley v. Allen
81 P. 186 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1905)