Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance
409 N.E.2d 1002, 50 N.Y.2d 989, 431 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2523
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (71 AD2d 778; see, also, Harcel Liqs. v Evsam Parking, 48 NY2d 503).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance, 409 N.E.2d 1002, 50 N.Y.2d 989, 431 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2523 (N.Y. 1980).
409 N.E.2d 1002 (Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harcel Liquors, Inc. v. Evsam Parking, Inc.
399 N.E.2d 905 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance
71 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)