Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance
409 N.E.2d 1002, 50 N.Y.2d 989, 431 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2523
This text of 409 N.E.2d 1002 (Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance, 409 N.E.2d 1002, 50 N.Y.2d 989, 431 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2523 (N.Y. 1980).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (71 AD2d 778; see, also, Harcel Liqs. v Evsam Parking, 48 NY2d 503).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harcel Liquors, Inc. v. Evsam Parking, Inc.
399 N.E.2d 905 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Milmar Super Drugs Corp. v. Department of Taxation & Finance
71 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
409 N.E.2d 1002, 50 N.Y.2d 989, 431 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milmar-super-drugs-corp-v-department-of-taxation-finance-ny-1980.