Millville Improvement Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

47 A. 1132, 61 N.J. Eq. 671, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 224
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 19, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 A. 1132 (Millville Improvement Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Millville Improvement Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 47 A. 1132, 61 N.J. Eq. 671, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 224 (N.J. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Grey, who advised it.

This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to the parties in respect to any application they may be advised to make in [672]*672the court of chancery, when the cause is remitted, as to the mode of sale of the mortgaged premises directed by the decree.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh—12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Quackenbush
61 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A. 1132, 61 N.J. Eq. 671, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millville-improvement-co-v-pittsburgh-plate-glass-co-nj-1900.