Millsapps v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Millsapps v. State

4 S.E.2d 410, 60 Ga. App. 555, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 79

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 7, 1939·No. 27804·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was tried for murder, and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence. All of the special grounds of the motion for new trial allege errors of commission or omission in the charge of the court; but none of such grounds, when considered in the light of the charge as given and the facts of the case, requires a reversal of the judgment. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was tried for murder, and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence. All of the special grounds of the motion for new trial allege errors of commission or omission in the charge of the court; but none of such grounds, when considered in the light of the charge as given and the facts of the case, requires a reversal of the judgment. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Millsapps v. State, 4 S.E.2d 410, 60 Ga. App. 555, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 79 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

4 S.E.2d 410 (Millsapps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.