Mills v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia·Decided June 1, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-00727·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

CHARLESTON DIVISION

CLAUDE MILLS,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00727

WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES., et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants Sandra May, Joshua Shrewsbery, and Wexford Health Sources, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 20), and Defendant Charles Lye’s Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 28). By standing order entered on January 4, 2016, and filed in this case on October 7, 2019, (ECF No. 5), this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation for disposition (“PF&R”). Magistrate Judge Tinsley entered his PF&R on May 5, 2021, recommending this Court deny both motions to dismiss without prejudice because Plaintiff Claude Mills was recently granted leave to amend his Complaint. (ECF No. 32.) This Court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, factual or legal conclusions contained within the PF&R to which no objections were addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and Plaintiff’s right to appeal this Court’s order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). In 1 addition, this Court need not conduct a de novo review when a party “makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate’s proposed findings and recommendations.” Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). Objections to the PF&R in this case were due on May 24, 2021. To date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R, (ECF No. 32), and DENIES the pending motions to dismiss, (ECF Nos. 20, 28) WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This matter remains referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. IT ISSO ORDERED. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: June 1, 2021

&

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., (S.D.W. Va. 2021).

Mills v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (Mills v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.
727 F.2d 91 (Fourth Circuit, 1984)
Snyder v. Ridenour
889 F.2d 1363 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)