Mills v. United States

504 U.S. 955, 112 S. Ct. 2300

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 1, 1992

DocketNo. 91-664

StatusPublished

Cited by34 cases

This text of 504 U.S. 955 (Mills v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mills v. United States, 504 U.S. 955, 112 S. Ct. 2300 (1992).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webco Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

90 F. App'x 276 (Tenth Circuit, 2003)

Edward S. Quirk Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

241 F.3d 41 (First Circuit, 2001)

City of Kansas City v. Hon

972 S.W.2d 407 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)

Mruz v. Caring, Inc.

991 F. Supp. 701 (D. New Jersey, 1998)

Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner

95 F.3d 218 (Second Circuit, 1996)

Eagle Traffic Control, Inc. v. James Julian, Inc.

933 F. Supp. 1251 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)

GICC Capital Corp. v. Technology Finance Group, Inc.

67 F.3d 463 (Second Circuit, 1995)

De Wit v. Firstar Corp.

879 F. Supp. 947 (N.D. Iowa, 1995)

47 F.3d 1280 (Third Circuit, 1995)

Mathon v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.

875 F. Supp. 986 (E.D. New York, 1995)

Sprague v. Walter

656 A.2d 890 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)

Coan v. Bernier (In Re Bernier)

176 B.R. 976 (D. Connecticut, 1995)

United States v. Robert Aulicino, Jr., David Cleary, and Louis Ruggiero, Jr.

44 F.3d 1102 (Second Circuit, 1995)

Piezo Crystal Co. v. Uddeholm Corp.

870 F. Supp. 589 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1994)

Streck v. Peters

855 F. Supp. 1156 (D. Hawaii, 1994)

Sisseton Education Ass'n v. Sisseton School District No. 54-8

516 N.W.2d 301 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)

Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James Elliot

20 F.3d 771 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)

Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.

6 F.3d 88 (Third Circuit, 1993)

Dorothy Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Individual David Boggs, an Indiv. Ewing Pollock, an Indiv. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Company Consol-Land Development Company Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Ewing Pollock and the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, in No. 92-3380. Paul Kent Mabel Kent, in No. 92-3437 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk James McIntyre Glenna McIntyre in No. 92-3438 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. Mike Wilson, an Ind. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Mark E. Headlee Charlotte Headlee, in No. 92-3439 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Dorothy Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co., Consolidation Coal Co., the Monongahela Railway Co., Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Rheinbraun U.S. And Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk, in No. 92-3444. Dorothy Loughman, in No. 92-3445 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Larry Levine Dan Levine Morris Levine Edward Levine, Individuals and Morris Levine Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation and Levine Iron and Metal, Inc., a Corporation v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Larry Levine, Dan Levine, Morris Levine, Morris Levine Enterprises, Inc., and Levine Iron and Metal, Inc., in No. 92-3446. James E. Hughes Linda L. Hughes, in No. 92-3447 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. William Reese, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. And Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. John W. Yesenosky, Jr. Linda M. Yesenosky, in No. 92-3450 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. William Reese, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Thomas J. Allen, Esquire, Personal Representative of the Estate of John T. Throckmorten, in No. 92-3451 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk

6 F.3d 88 (Third Circuit, 1993)

Pucci v. Litwin

828 F. Supp. 1285 (N.D. Illinois, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 U.S. 955, 112 S. Ct. 2300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-united-states-scotus-1992.