Mills v. Thursby

11 How. Pr. 121, 1853 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 9
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mills v. Thursby. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 How. Pr. 114
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 26, 1853·No. No. 5.·Published

Opinion

Edwards, Justice.

I think that the affidavit of the sheriff shows that a valid levy was made upon the personal property of the defendant before his death, and before the return day of the execution. But I am not prepared to say that there was a sufficient levy upon the real estate. It does not appear that any act whatever was done, showing that the sheriff intended to make such levy. On the contrary, I think that his affidavit shows that he did not intend to levy upon any other than the personal property. If the plaintiff insists that a valid levy can be made under an execution after the return day, I will hear a further argument upon that point. In the meantime, the motion to stay proceedings, under the levy made upon the personal property of the defendant, is denied without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. Thursby, 11 How. Pr. 121, 1853 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 9 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1853).

11 How. Pr. 121 (Mills v. Thursby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.