Mills v. The Whistler

E.D. New York

Mills v. The Whistler

30 F. 199, 1886 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156

DecidedDecember 31, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. 199 (Mills v. The Whistler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mills v. The Whistler, 30 F. 199, 1886 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156 (E.D.N.Y. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Benedict, J.

This is an action to enforce alien upon a domestic vessel, arising under the laws of the state of New York. The libelant’s lien, if ho ever had one, was, in my opinion, lost when the vessel went in the regular course of her occupation from Brooklyn as far as Long Beach, on the Atlantic ocean, returned, and put into Rockaway inlet; there making fast to the shore. This was, in my opinion, a leaving of the port.

The libel must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict, J.

This is an action to enforce alien upon a domestic vessel, arising under the laws of the state of New York. The libelant’s lien, if ho ever had one, was, in my opinion, lost when the vessel went in the regular course of her occupation from Brooklyn as far as Long Beach, on the Atlantic ocean, returned, and put into Rockaway inlet; there making fast to the shore. This was, in my opinion, a leaving of the port.

The libel must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. 199, 1886 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-the-whistler-nyed-1886.