Mills v. The Whistler

E.D. New York

Mills v. The Whistler

30 F. 199, 1886 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided December 31, 1886·Published

Opinion

Benedict, J.

This is an action to enforce alien upon a domestic vessel, arising under the laws of the state of New York. The libelant’s lien, if ho ever had one, was, in my opinion, lost when the vessel went in the regular course of her occupation from Brooklyn as far as Long Beach, on the Atlantic ocean, returned, and put into Rockaway inlet; there making fast to the shore. This was, in my opinion, a leaving of the port.

The libel must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict, J.

This is an action to enforce alien upon a domestic vessel, arising under the laws of the state of New York. The libelant’s lien, if ho ever had one, was, in my opinion, lost when the vessel went in the regular course of her occupation from Brooklyn as far as Long Beach, on the Atlantic ocean, returned, and put into Rockaway inlet; there making fast to the shore. This was, in my opinion, a leaving of the port.

The libel must be dismissed.

Mills v. The Whistler, 30 F. 199, 1886 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156 (E.D.N.Y. 1886).

Pincite

30 F. 199 (Mills v. The Whistler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.