Mills v. Superior Traffic Servs. Corp.
This text of Mills v. Superior Traffic Servs. Corp. (Mills v. Superior Traffic Servs. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSEPH MILLS, AN INDIVIDUA; AND | No,, 845238 PEGGY MILLS, AN INDIVIDUAL, qi Appellants, F H LL & Le vs. SUPERIOR TRAFFIC SERVICES . OCT 24 2022
CORP.,
c ELIZAS: TH & A. Leo Bd 1 Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AS ABANDONED
After the settlement judge reported that the parties had agreed to a settlement, this court entered an order directing appellants to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal within 30 days. To date, appellants have not responded to our order or otherwise communicated with this court.
Accordingly, cause appearing, we dismiss this appeal as abandoned.
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
By: SLA RT Qe
ce: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge John Walter Boyer, Settlement Judge Clear Counsel Law Group Springel & Fink, LLP Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME CouRT OF NEVADA
CLERK’S ORDER
Weta Bie Z cd ~ S370 S
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mills v. Superior Traffic Servs. Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-superior-traffic-servs-corp-nev-2022.