Mills v. State

139 S.W.2d 270, 139 Tex. Crim. 161, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 271
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mills v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Tex. Crim. 356
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 24, 1940·No. No. 20989·Published

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Bell County for the offense of robbery by assault and his punishment assessed at confinement in the State penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

We note that the judgment and sentence appearing in the record condemn appellant to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than ten nor more than ten years. This is error. Under the terms of the Indeterminate Sentence Law (C. C. P., 1925, Art. 775), the judgment and sentence will be reformed so as to confine appellant in the State penitentiary for a period of not less than five nor more than ten years.

As reformed, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. State, 139 S.W.2d 270, 139 Tex. Crim. 161, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 271 (Tex. 1940).

139 S.W.2d 270 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.