Mills v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mills v. State

224 S.W. 780, 87 Tex. Crim. 655, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mills v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 Tex. Crim. 515 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 1920·No. No. 5854.·Published

Opinions

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Rains County, Texas, of the offense of theft of property under the value of $50.

The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for the want of a sufficient recognizance. An inspection of the record convinces us of the correctness of the position taken. There is no recognizance, such as is required by Article 919 of our C.C.P., found in the record.

The appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE. October 13, 1920.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Rains County, Texas, of the offense of theft of property under the value of $50.

The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for the want of a sufficient recognizance. An inspection of the record convinces us of the correctness of the position taken. There is no recognizance, such as is required by Article 919 of our C.C.P., found in the record.

The appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE. October 13, 1920.

Mills v. State, 224 S.W. 780, 87 Tex. Crim. 655, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316 (Tex. 1920).

Pincite

224 S.W. 780 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.