Mills v. State
872 S.W.2d 572, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 1994 WL 41375
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).
Further, we find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mills v. State, 872 S.W.2d 572, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 259, 1994 WL 41375 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
872 S.W.2d 572 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.