Mills v. State
59 S.E.2d 44, 81 Ga. App. 463, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 916
Opinion
1. The special grounds of the amended motion for a new trial are the same as those in Huff v. State, ante 461, and the rulings there are adverse to the contentions of the plaintiff in error in this case.
2. The jury was authorized to find that the defendant made a free and voluntary confession and that the same was corroborated by proof of the corpus delicti. Miller v. State, 60 Ga. App. 682 (2) (4 S. E. 2d, 729).
3. The evidence authorized the verdict and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mills v. State, 59 S.E.2d 44, 81 Ga. App. 463, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 916 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950).
59 S.E.2d 44 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barksdale v. State
78 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)