Mills v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mills v. State

126 S.E. 301, 33 Ga. App. 344, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 751

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mills v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Ga. App. 471 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 13, 1925·No. 15995·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

It appearing from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was not tendered to the judge within twenty days from the date of the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the assignments of error.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Norman & Norman, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

It appearing from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was not tendered to the judge within twenty days from the date of the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the assignments of error.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Norman & Norman, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

Mills v. State, 126 S.E. 301, 33 Ga. App. 344, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 751 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

126 S.E. 301 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.