Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mills v. State

53 So. 3d 1092, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 560, 2011 WL 148819

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 2011

Docket1D10-4759

StatusPublished

This text of 53 So. 3d 1092 (Mills v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mills v. State, 53 So. 3d 1092, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 560, 2011 WL 148819 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court shall rule on the pending motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days from issuance of mandate in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We hereby grant the petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court shall rule on the pending motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, within a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days from issuance of mandate in this cause. Because we are confident that the circuit court will issue a ruling, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 So. 3d 1092, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 560, 2011 WL 148819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.