Mills v. State

891 So. 2d 612, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 557, 2005 WL 155482
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mills v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 840 So. 2d 464
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2005·No. No. 2D04-3602·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s order dismissing Kenneth Mills’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, without prejudice to any right Mills may have to file a petition in the proper court. See Razz v. State, 828 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). To the extent that the order of dismissal addressed the arguments Mills raised, we strike those rulings. The court had no jurisdiction to reach the merits of the petition.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. State, 891 So. 2d 612, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 557, 2005 WL 155482 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

891 So. 2d 612 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Razz v. State
828 So. 2d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)