Mills v. State

642 So. 2d 145, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8847, 1994 WL 500800
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 1994·No. No. 93-2306·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[146]*146ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of this court issued June 22, 1994 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted. The motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by appellant, considered in light of this substituted opinion, are denied.

We affirm the trial court’s assessment of $200.00 for costs of prosecution against appellant since he failed to object to imposition of such costs during the sentencing hearing. See Thomas v. State, 633 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We reverse, however, the amount of court costs imposed in the trial court’s order and remand with instructions to correct that amount to reflect an assessment of $295.00 in court costs.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, C.J., HERSEY, J., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., JR., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. State, 642 So. 2d 145, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8847, 1994 WL 500800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

642 So. 2d 145 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norman v. State
676 So. 2d 7 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)