Mills v. State

521 So. 2d 339, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 958, 1988 WL 20044
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 1988·No. No. 86-3294·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s judgment and sentence is affirmed, however, we strike the costs imposed without benefit of notice and hearing. The state may seek reimposition of those costs after appropriate notice and hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Dilla v. State, 503 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. State, 521 So. 2d 339, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 958, 1988 WL 20044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

521 So. 2d 339 (Mills v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Dilla v. State
503 So. 2d 1316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)