Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mills v. State

176 So. 2d 118, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4253

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1965

DocketNo. 64-761

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 176 So. 2d 118 (Mills v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mills v. State, 176 So. 2d 118, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of a conviction of unlawfully breaking and entering" a dwelling house without a dangerous-weapon with intent to commit a felony, to wit: robbery and robbery, for which he-was sentenced to a term of fifteen years in-, the State Penitentiary.

Appellant contends that he is entitled to a reversal on two grounds: (1) the trial judge committed reversible error in denying his motion to suppress his palm prints, as evidence; (2) it was reversible error to-admit the testimony relating to events occurring subsequent to the date of the al[119]*119leged offense for which the appellant was tried.

We have carefully considered these contentions in the light of the briefs and the record on appeal and have found no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI