Mills v. State
This text of 880 So. 2d 616 (Mills v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mark D. MILLS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Robert R. Wheeler, Bureau Chief, and Karen M. Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Mills v. State, 791 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), which expressly and directly conflicts with our decision in Harvey v. State, 848 So.2d 1060 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the First District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Harvey and Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452 (Fla.2003).
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
880 So. 2d 616, 2004 WL 1515972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-state-fla-2004.