Mills v. Scott

62 Miss. 525
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 Miss. 525 (Mills v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mills v. Scott, 62 Miss. 525 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The validity of the assessment roll, which was deposited by the [529]*529assessor on the day required by the statute with the clerk of the board of supervisors, is not affected by the failure of the clerk to mark it filed.

The board of supervisors held its August meeting at the time and place required by law. No objections seem to have been taken to the assessment, nor does it appear that at that meeting or at any other there were any corrections made. We must assume that none were made because none were required, or, if made, that it was done at the proper time.

While the board at its September term used the word “received” in its order in reference to the roll, it is apparent from the whole order that the word was used in the sense of approved, and an approval at that term was sufficient. Wolfe v. Murphy, 60 Miss. 1.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mixon v. Clevenger
74 Miss. 67 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1896)
Grayson v. Richardson
65 Miss. 222 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Miss. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-scott-miss-1885.