Mills v. Redick

1 Neb. 437
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1871·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The court,

by Streeter, J.,

held that the instruction was erroneous, that the houses were properly subject to replevin when the possession of them was taken from the plaintiff, and that the defendants could not be deprived of this x-emedy by any thing they had done with it.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. Redick, 1 Neb. 437 (Neb. 1871).

1 Neb. 437 (Mills v. Redick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gafford Lumber & Grain Co. v. Eaves
220 P. 512 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)
Ellsworth v. McDowell
62 N.W. 1082 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
McDaniel v. Lipp
60 N.W. 81 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
McDonald v. Shepard
25 Kan. 112 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1881)
Jewett v. Dringer
30 N.J. Eq. 291 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1878)
Central Branch Railroad v. Fritz
20 Kan. 430 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)