Mills v. Redick
1 Neb. 437
This text of 1 Neb. 437 (Mills v. Redick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mills v. Redick, 1 Neb. 437 (Neb. 1871).
Opinion
The court,
held that the instruction was erroneous, that the houses were properly subject to replevin when the possession of them was taken from the plaintiff, and that the defendants could not be deprived of this x-emedy by any thing they had done with it.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gafford Lumber & Grain Co. v. Eaves
220 P. 512 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)
Ellsworth v. McDowell
62 N.W. 1082 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
McDaniel v. Lipp
60 N.W. 81 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
McDonald v. Shepard
25 Kan. 112 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1881)
Jewett v. Dringer
30 N.J. Eq. 291 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1878)
Central Branch Railroad v. Fritz
20 Kan. 430 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Neb. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-redick-neb-1871.