Mills v. Ray

3 Ky. Op. 559, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 197
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 8, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ky. Op. 559 (Mills v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mills v. Ray, 3 Ky. Op. 559, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 197 (Ky. Ct. App. 1870).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

The deed from Bay and wife to Miller contains no statement that any part of the purchase money remained unpaid; on the contrary the recital therein that the conveyance was made in consideration of “eight hundred dollars” without stating when or how it was paid the implication would be that the money was all paid then.

The vendors, Bay and wife, having conveyed the land and having failed to state what part of the purchase money was unpaid under [560]*560the statute waived their lien, as was held by this court in Chapman, etc., vs. Stockwell, etc., 18 B. M., 650, and subsequent cases. Wherefore, so much of the judgment as adjudged to appellee a lien on the land for the satisfaction of his debt is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition so far as it seeks to subject the land to sale to enforce the lien, but the personal judgment against appellant is affirmed.

Farleigh, Walker, for appellant. Coale & Johnson, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ky. Op. 559, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-ray-kyctapp-1870.