Mills v. People ex rel. Sprague

30 Colo. 396
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1902
DocketNo. 4581
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Colo. 396 (Mills v. People ex rel. Sprague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mills v. People ex rel. Sprague, 30 Colo. 396 (Colo. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an original proceeding, whereby it is sought to review the action of the district court of Arapahoe county, in directing the petitioner to certify the name of respondent as a candidate for representative to the next general assembly from the district comprising the counties of El Paso and Teller. Excluding this day, it is only four days before [397]*397election. Independent of the merits of the controversy, the petitioner contends that the district court acted without jurisdiction. Whether or not this court shall assume jurisdiction in actions of this character is entirely a matter of discretion, and that discretion should not he exercised in favor of a review, except sufficient time can he taken to give the questions presented for determination that consideration which their importance demands. There is not sufficient time for that purpose, and we, therefore,' decline to review the judgment. Ford v. Beckwith, 28 Colo., 95.

Proceeding Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. Beckwith
28 Colo. 95 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Colo. 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-people-ex-rel-sprague-colo-1902.