Mills v. New York, N. H. & H. R.
149 N.Y.S. 1097, 165 A.D. 925, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8179
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 149 N.Y.S. 1097 (Mills v. New York, N. H. & H. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mills v. New York, N. H. & H. R., 149 N.Y.S. 1097, 165 A.D. 925, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We think that the great preponderance of evidence is to the effect that plaintiff could have seen the engine approaching if he had looked. The darkness was not sufficient to prevent this.
RICH and STAPLETON, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
149 N.Y.S. 1097, 165 A.D. 925, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-new-york-n-h-h-r-nyappdiv-1914.