Mills v. Mills

231 S.W. 697, 111 Tex. 265, 1921 Tex. LEXIS 90
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1921
DocketNo. 3271, Motion No. 5091.
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 231 S.W. 697 (Mills v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mills v. Mills, 231 S.W. 697, 111 Tex. 265, 1921 Tex. LEXIS 90 (Tex. 1921).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice PHILLIPS

delivered the opinion of the court.

In approving the report of the Commission of Appeals in this case, and in accord with its recommendation, we originally reversed the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and remanded the case to the District Court for further trial.

It has come to our attention that the Court of Civil Appeals in its disposiiton of the ease did not consider certain assignments of error presented by the appellant there relating to the admissibility of certain testimony, but reversed the judgment of the District Court upon another and independent ground.

*266 The Supreme Court is without jurisdiction of the assignments of error relating to this testimony, and the Court of Civil Appeals should not be denied the opportunity of determining them.

Both motions for rehearing, filed respectively by the plaintiffs in error and the defendant in error, will be overruled. Our judgment reversing the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals will stand, but instead of the cause being remanded to the District Court, as was done originally, it will be remanded to the Court of Civil Appeals for its consideration of the assignments of error on the testimony questions.

Reversed .and remanded to■ Court of Civil Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caddel v. Caddel
486 S.W.2d 141 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Prince v. North State Bank of Amarillo
484 S.W.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Greenville Avenue State Bank v. Lang
421 S.W.2d 748 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Owen Development Company v. Calvert
302 S.W.2d 640 (Texas Supreme Court, 1957)
LOUISIANA & ARKANSAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. Pruitt
298 S.W.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. McFerrin
291 S.W.2d 931 (Texas Supreme Court, 1956)
Kuykendall Et Ux. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co
208 F.2d 921 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)
McGuire v. City of Dallas
141 Tex. 170 (Texas Supreme Court, 1943)
McGuire v. City of Dallas
170 S.W.2d 722 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1943)
Scroggins v. City of Harlingen
112 S.W.2d 1035 (Texas Supreme Court, 1938)
Davy Burnt Clay Ballast Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas
285 S.W. 295 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1926)
Mills v. Mills
253 S.W. 542 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 S.W. 697, 111 Tex. 265, 1921 Tex. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-mills-tex-1921.