Mills v. Joshua Hendy Corp.

79 F. Supp. 709
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedSeptember 3, 1947
DocketNo. 5870-M
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 F. Supp. 709 (Mills v. Joshua Hendy Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mills v. Joshua Hendy Corp., 79 F. Supp. 709 (S.D. Cal. 1947).

Opinion

McCORMICK, District Judge.

We have given deliberate consideration to the applicability of Section 2(d) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. g 252(d), to this action and to the evidence in the record before us in this action.

We are of the opinion that under the concrete situation before us in this action, the provisions of the amendatory act effective May 14, 1947 are inapplicable.

We find that, plaintiff’s decedent under unrepealed and effective terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., was actually hired to, and did, perform productive services with right to compensation during the so called “lunch or eating periods.” There was no real lunch period allocated. Services of the same type and continuity were rendered at all times.

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment for the plaintiff for $645.191 unpaid overtime wages without liquidated damages and attorney’s fees of $75 and costs are ordered.

Plaintiff’s attorney will prepare and serve Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment accordingly within 5 days from notice of this ruling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tully v. Joshua Hendy Corp.
79 F. Supp. 709 (S.D. California, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 F. Supp. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-joshua-hendy-corp-casd-1947.