Mills v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mills v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security

398 So. 2d 500, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20029

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 26, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1560

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 398 So. 2d 500 (Mills v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mills v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security, 398 So. 2d 500, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20029 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which affirmed a decision of an appeals referee denying him unemployment compensation benefits. He contends that this determination was erroneous because he left his employment for “good cause attributable to his employer” under Section 443.-06(1), Florida Statutes (1979). There is, however competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that Mills quit his CETA job with Dade County, not in reaction to a supposedly unreasonable requirement imposed by his supervisor, but rather simply because he thought he had secured another position. Since this is true, this court may not set aside the referee’s resolution of the issue in question. Perez v. State, Department of Labor and Employment Security, 377 So.2d 806 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which affirmed a decision of an appeals referee denying him unemployment compensation benefits. He contends that this determination was erroneous because he left his employment for “good cause attributable to his employer” under Section 443.-06(1), Florida Statutes (1979). There is, however competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that Mills quit his CETA job with Dade County, not in reaction to a supposedly unreasonable requirement imposed by his supervisor, but rather simply because he thought he had secured another position. Since this is true, this court may not set aside the referee’s resolution of the issue in question. Perez v. State, Department of Labor and Employment Security, 377 So.2d 806 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

398 So. 2d 500, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-florida-department-of-labor-employment-security-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack