Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mills v. Florida Department of Corrections

Mills v. Florida Department of Corrections

204 So. 3d 571, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17384
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-2293
StatusPublished

This text of 204 So. 3d 571 (Mills v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mills v. Florida Department of Corrections, 204 So. 3d 571, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17384 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because we find that the Appellant has sufficiently alleged' that “collateral legal consequences that affect the rights of a party flow from the issue to be determined,” Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211, 212 (Fla.1992) (citing Keezel v. State, 358 So.2d 247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)), we vacate the circuit court’s order dismissing the petition for writ of mandamus as moot, and we remand this matter for a determination on the merits of the petition. This opinion shall not be construed as passing upon the merits of the underlying petition.

ORDER VACATED; REMANDED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keezel v. State
358 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 So. 3d 571, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2016.