Mills v. Chapman

1 How. Pr. 102
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 102 (Mills v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mills v. Chapman, 1 How. Pr. 102 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice.

Held, that the order to stay proceedings, served on plaintiff’s attorney, prevented plaintiff from proceeding to trial, as he had elected to show cause. Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-chapman-nysupct-1845.