Mills v. Chai-Chang

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mills v. Chai-Chang

947 So. 2d 629, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 363, 2007 WL 102109

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 2007·No. No. 3D06-2115·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny Dwight Chai-Chang’s motion to dismiss. We treat Coleen A. Mills’ “Request for An Appeal” as her Initial Brief. Mills appeals the trial court’s order denying her Motion to Vacate Judgment. No court reporter was present at this hearing. The trial court’s order includes specific findings of fact regarding the credibility of the witnesses that testified at the hearing. Without a transcript of this hearing, the record presented to us is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. This Court is therefore required to affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We deny Dwight Chai-Chang’s motion to dismiss. We treat Coleen A. Mills’ “Request for An Appeal” as her Initial Brief. Mills appeals the trial court’s order denying her Motion to Vacate Judgment. No court reporter was present at this hearing. The trial court’s order includes specific findings of fact regarding the credibility of the witnesses that testified at the hearing. Without a transcript of this hearing, the record presented to us is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. This Court is therefore required to affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.

Mills v. Chai-Chang, 947 So. 2d 629, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 363, 2007 WL 102109 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

947 So. 2d 629 (Mills v. Chai-Chang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related