Mills v. Cerner Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mills v. Cerner Corp.

496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994123, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 525

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 24, 2016

DocketWD 78172

StatusPublished

This text of 496 S.W.3d 634 (Mills v. Cerner Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mills v. Cerner Corp., 496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994123, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Patricia Mills appeals from a jury verdict finding her former employer, Cerner Corporation, not hable for either discrimination or retaliation under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). Mills argues that Cerner’s counsel infringed upon her constitutional right to counsel during closing argument when Cerner used the timing of Mills’s decision to contact an attorney to argue that her allegations were not credible. Mills further argues that the trial court erred in refusing her proposed, non-MAI verdict director in favor of the MAI-approved verdict director offered by Cerner. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Patricia Mills appeals from a jury verdict finding her former employer, Cerner Corporation, not hable for either discrimination or retaliation under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). Mills argues that Cerner’s counsel infringed upon her constitutional right to counsel during closing argument when Cerner used the timing of Mills’s decision to contact an attorney to argue that her allegations were not credible. Mills further argues that the trial court erred in refusing her proposed, non-MAI verdict director in favor of the MAI-approved verdict director offered by Cerner. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994123, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mills-v-cerner-corp-moctapp-2016.