Mills v. Cerner Corp.

496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994123, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 525
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 24, 2016·No. WD 78172·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Patricia Mills appeals from a jury verdict finding her former employer, Cerner Corporation, not hable for either discrimination or retaliation under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). Mills argues that Cerner’s counsel infringed upon her constitutional right to counsel during closing argument when Cerner used the timing of Mills’s decision to contact an attorney to argue that her allegations were not credible. Mills further argues that the trial court erred in refusing her proposed, non-MAI verdict director in favor of the MAI-approved verdict director offered by Cerner. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mills v. Cerner Corp., 496 S.W.3d 634, 2016 WL 2994123, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 525 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

496 S.W.3d 634 (Mills v. Cerner Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.